Lindsey Straus Lindsey Straus   IN: Prevention & Risk Reduction, Concussion Essentials   Tagged: , ,  
  • Lindsey Straus

    Author: Lindsey Straus is an award-winning youth sports journalist, practicing attorney, and has been Senior Editor of SmartTeams since its launch as MomsTEAM in August 2000. She can be reached at lbartonstraus@MomsTEAM.com.

  • Lindsey Straus

Detailed Concussion History Important in Treatment and Prevention

Concussion experts agree that the taking of a detailed concussion history is important, not just in the post-concussion treatment of an athlete,(4) but in identifying athletes during a pre-participation physical evaluation at high risk of further concussion. (1-3)

Questions to ask

Because many athletes will not recognize all the concussions they have suffered in the past, the taking a structured concussion history (1) should include questions about:

  • previous symptoms of a concussion, not just the perceived number of past concussions (note: relying on the recall of concussions by teammates or coaches has been shown to be unreliable);
  • all previous head, face or cervical spine injuries (concussive injuries that occurred as a result of such injuries may be missed unless these other types of injuries are specifically assessed);
  • concussions where the severity of symptoms seemed disproportionate to the force of the blow or impact that caused it which may alert the clinician to a progressively increasing vulnerability to injury and is considered a “modifying factor” in concussion management); 
  • the presence of mood (e.g. anxiety, depression), learning, attention (ADD/ADHD) or migraine headaches (needed to assess risk and for historical reference in case of injury, especially as they may account for an elevated score on a post-concussion symptom scale); and
  • the protective equipment (e.g. helmet) worn at the time of the most recent injury and injuries more remote in time.

Value of concussion history during PPE

The taking of a detailed concussion history during a pre-participation physical evaluation or examination (PPE) is helpful, concussion experts say, because it:

  • May identify at-risk athletes: the history may pre-identify athletes who are at greater risk of further concussions which can have long-term health consequences, including cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral problems;
  • Provides a teachable moment: bringing up the subject of concussion provides the healthcare provider an opportunity to provide accurate information to parents and athletes and educate them about to the significance of his or her concussion history (indeed, based on a finding that athletes report having suffered more concussions after watching a concussion education Powerpoint, a 2016 study (5) specifically recommends that clinicians preface a request for a concussion history explain what a concussion is); and
  • Offers an opportunity for behavior modification: it may allow the examiner a chance to suggest that the athlete modify his behavior (i.e. avoiding a dangerous style of play; employing safer tackling techniques etc.).

1. McCrory P, et alConcussion statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:250-258.

2. Harmon K, et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:15-26.

3. Giza C, Kutcher J, Ashwal S, et. al. Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2013 (published online ahead of print March 18, 2013): DOI:10.1212/WNL.ob013e31828d57dd (accessed March 23, 2013)

4.  Halstead ME, et al. Clinical Report: Returning to Learning Following a Concussion. Pediatrics doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2867 (epub October 27, 2013).

5. Miyashita TL, Diakogeorgiou E, VanderVegt C. Gender Differences in Concussion Reporting Among High School Athletes. Sports Health: A Multidisicplinary Approach. 2016; 8(4):359-363 (p

 

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons